1. <wbr id="ngws2"></wbr>

          1. 蜜桃一区二区免费视频观看,国产精品狼人久久久影院,久久久久中文字幕精品无码免费 ,国产精品午夜福利在线观看,成年人手机在线免费观看视频,人成午夜大片免费视频77777,欧美激情一区二区久久久,亚洲Av综合日韩精品久久久
            撥號18861759551

            你的位置:首頁 > 技術文章 > 光學畸變比較

            技術文章

            光學畸變比較

            技術文章

            Comparison of Optical Aberrations

            Optical aberrations are deviations from a perfect, mathematical model. It is important to note that they are not caused by any physical, optical, or mechanical flaws. Rather, they can be caused by the lens shape itself, or placement of optical elements within a system, due to the wave nature of light. Optical systems are typically designed using first order or paraxial optics in order to calculate image size and location. Paraxial optics does not take into account aberrations; it treats light as a ray, and therefore omits the wave phenomena that cause aberrations. For an introduction on optical aberrations, view Chromatic and Monochromatic Optical Aberrations.

             

            After defining the different groups and types of chromatic and monochromatic optical aberrations, the difficult part becomes recognizing them in a system, either through computer analysis or real-world observation, and then correcting the system to reduce the aberrations. Typically, optical designers first put a system into optical system design software, such as Zemax® or Code V®, to check the performance and aberrations of the system. It is important to note that after an optical component is made, aberrations can be recognized by observing the output of the system.

             

            Optically Identifying Aberrations

            Determining what aberrations are present in an optical system is not always an easy task, even when in the computer analysis stage, as commonly two or more aberrations are present in any given system. Optical designers use a variety of tools to recognize aberrations and try to correct for them, often including computer generated spot diagrams, wave fan diagrams, and ray fan diagrams. Spot diagrams illustrate how a single point of light would appear after being imaged through the system. Wave fan diagrams are plots of the wavefront relative to the flattened wavefront where a perfect wave would be flat along the x direction. Ray fan diagrams are plots of points of the ray fan versus pupil coordinates. The following menu illustrates representative wave fan and ray fan diagrams for tangential (vertical, y direction) and sagittal (horizontal, z direction) planes where H = 1 for each of the following aberrations: tilt (W111), defocus (W020), spherical (W040), coma (W131), astigmatism (W222), field curvature (W220), and distortion (W311). Simply select the aberration of interest to see each illustration.

             

            Aberration Name (Wavefront Coefficient):

            Recognizing aberrations, especially in the design stage, is the first step in correcting for them. Why does an optical designer want to correct for aberrations? The answer is to create a system that is diffraction limited, which is the best possible performance. Diffraction-limited systems have all aberrations contained within the Airy disk spot size, or the size of the diffraction pattern caused by a circular aperture (Figure 1).

             

            Equation 1 can be used to calculate the Airy disk spot size (d) where λ is the wavelength used in the system and f/# is the f-number of the system.

             

            OPTICAL ABERRATION EXAMPLES

            After a system is designed and manufactured, aberrations can be observed by imaging a point source, such as a laser, through the system to see how the single point appears on the image plane. Multiple aberrations can be present, but in general, the more similar the image looks to a spot, the fewer the aberrations; this is regardless of size, as the spot could be magnified by the system. The following seven examples illustrate the ray behavior if the corresponding aberration was the only one in the system, simulations of aberrated images using common test targets (Figures 2 - 4), and possible corrective actions to minimize the aberration.

             

            Simulations were created in Code V® and are exaggerated to better illustrate the induced aberration. It is important to note that the only aberrations discussed are first and third orders, due to their commonality, as correction of higher order aberrations becomes very complex for the slight improvement in image quality.

            Figure 2: Fixed Frequency Grid Distortion Target

             

            Figure 3: Negative Contrast 1951 USAF Resolution Target

             

            Figure 4: Star Target

             

            Tilt – W111

             

            Figure : Representation of Tilt Aberration

            Figure 5b: Simulation of Tilt Aberration

            Characterization

            Image Has Incorrect Magnification

            Caused by Actual Wavefront Being Tilted Relative to Reference Wavefront

            First Order: W111 = Hρcos (θ)

            Corrective Action

            Change System Magnification

             

            Defocus – W020

             

            Figure 6a: Representation of Defocus Aberration

            Figure 6b: Simulation of Defocus Aberration

            Characterization

            Image in Incorrect Image Plane

            Caused by Wrong Reference Image

            Used to Correct for Other Aberrations

            First Order: W020 = ρ2

            Corrective Action

            Refocus System, Find New Reference Image

             

            Spherical – W040

             

            Figure 7a: Representation of Spherical Aberration

            Figure 7b: Simulation of Spherical Aberration

            Characterization

            Image Appears Blurred, Rays from Edge Focus at Different Point than Rays from Center

            Occurs with all Spherical Optics

            On-Axis and Off-Axis Aberration

            Third Order: W040 = ρ4

            Corrective Action

            Counteract with Defocus

            Use Aspheric Lenses

            Lens Splitting

            Use Shape Factor of 1:PCX Lens

            High Index

             

            Coma – W131

             

            Figure 8a: Representation of Coma Aberration

            Figure 8b: Simulation of Coma Aberration

            Characterization

            Occurs When Magnification Changes with Respect to Location on the Image

            Two Types: Tangential (Vertical, Y Direction) and Sagittal (Horizontal, X Direction)

            Off-Axis Only

            Third Order: W131 = Hρ3;cos(θ)

            Corrective Action

            Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

             

            Astigmatism – W222

             

            Figure 9a: Representation of Astigmatism Aberration

            Figure 9b: Simulation of Astigmatism Aberration

            Characterization

            Causes Two Focus Points: One in the Horizontal (Sagittal) and the Other in the Vertical (Tangential) Direction

            Exit Pupil Appears Elliptical Off-Axis, Radius is Smaller in One direction

            Off-Axis Only

            Third Order: W222 = H2ρ2cos2(θ)

            Corrective Action

            Counteract with Defocus Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

             

            Field Curvature – W220

             

            Figure 10a: Representation of Field Curvature Aberration

            Figure 10b: Simulation of Field Curvature Aberrationn

            Characterization

            Image is Perfect, but Only on Curved Image Plane

            Caused by Power Distribution of Optic

            Off-Axis Only

            Third Order: W220 = H2 ρ2

            Corrective Action

            Use Spaced Doublet Lens

             

            Distortion – W311

             

            Figure 11a: Representation of Distortion Aberration

             

            Figure 11b: Simulation of Barrel Distortion Aberration

            Figure 11c: Simulation of Pincushion Distortion Aberration

            Characterization

            Quadratic Magnification Error, Points on Image Are Either Too Close or Too Far from the Center

            Positive Distortion is Called Barrel Distortion, Negative Called Pincushion Distortion

            Off-Axis Only

            Third Order: W311 = H3ρcos(θ)

            Corrective Action

            Decreased by Placing Aperture S in the Center of the System

             

            Recognizing optical aberrations is very important in correcting for them in an optical system, as the goal is to get the system to be diffraction limited. Optical and imaging systems can contain multiple combinations of aberrations, which can be classified as either chromatic or monochromatic. Correcting aberrations is best done in the design stage, where steps such as moving the aperture s or changing the type of optical lens can drastically reduce the number and severity (or magnitude) of aberrations. Overall, optical designers work to reduce first and third order aberrations primarily because reducing higher order aberrations adds significant complexity with only a slight improvement in image quality.

            聯系我們

            地址:江蘇省江陰市人民東路1091號1017室 傳真:0510-68836817 Email:sales@rympo.com
            24小時在線客服,為您服務!

            版權所有 © 2026 江陰韻翔光電技術有限公司 備案號:蘇ICP備16003332號-1 技術支持:化工儀器網 管理登陸 GoogleSitemap

            在線咨詢
            QQ客服
            QQ:17041053
            電話咨詢
            0510-68836815
            關注微信
            主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩精品久久久久免费看| 一本二本三本不卡无码| 日本香蕉久久一区二区视频| 亚洲av成人片无码| 久久777国产线看观看精品| 亚洲经典千人经典日产| 久久久精品人妻无码专区不卡| 免费看a级毛片| 国产欧美在线观看一区| 亚洲自在精品网久久一区| 亚洲伊人久久成人综合网| 亚洲AV永久无码一区| 亚洲一区二区三区av在线免费| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国产成人无码| 国产视频网站一区二区三区| 色婷婷综合缴情综在线播放| 久久精品一卡二卡三卡四卡| 波多野衣结在线精品二区| 人妻av无码专区| 午夜人成免费视频| 天海翼一区二区三区高清视频| 久久精品中文字幕极品| 小嫩模无套内谢第一次| 久久久久se色偷偷亚洲精品av| 97久久人人超碰超碰窝窝| 亚洲性夜夜天天天| 欧美国产高清| 中文字幕在线精品人妻| 野花社区www视频日本| 国产美女久久久亚洲综合| 日韩欧美在线观看成人| 热久久美女精品天天吊色| 国产精品成人久久电影| 国产精品狼人久久久影院| 亚洲AV无码久久精品日韩 | 国产成人av综合亚洲色欲 | 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 免费看a级毛片| 国产精品夜夜春夜夜爽久久小| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区|